|
Thomas Paine:
"[I]t is the value of the improvement, only, and not the earth itself,
that is individual property. Every proprietor, therefore, of cultivated
lands, owes the community a ground-rent (for I know of no better term to
express the idea) for the land which he holds; and it is from this
ground-rent that the fund proposed in this plan is to issue. ...The plan I
have to propose...is, To create a national fund, out of which there shall
be paid to every person, when arrived at the age of twenty-one years...a
compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance, by
the introduction of landed property....
"Man did not make the earth, and though he had a natural right to
occupy it, he had no right to locate as his property in perpetuity any
part of it; neither did the Creator of the earth open a land-office, from
whence the first title-deeds should issue." (Agrarian Justice, 1797).
John Stuart Mill:
Landlords "grow richer as it were, in their sleep, without working,
risking, or economising." It is "a kind of income which constantly tends
to increase, without any exertion or sacrifice on the part of the owners."
(Principles of Political Economy, bk.5, ch.2, sec.5)
Adam Smith:
"[G]round-rents...are a species of revenue which the owner, in many
cases, enjoys without any care or attention of his own. Though a part of
this revenue should be taken from him in order to defray the expenses of
the state, no discouragement will thereby be given to any sort of
industry." (The Wealth of Nations, Random House 1937 ed., pp. 795-6).
Thomas Jefferson:
"Whenever there is any country uncultivated lands and unemployed poor
it is clear that the laws of property have been so far extended as to
violate natural rights. The earth is given as a common stock for man to
labor and live on." (letter to Madison's father, Reverend Madison.)
John Locke:
"...Every man has a 'property' in his own 'person'. This nobody has a
right to but himself. The 'labour' of his body and the 'work' of his
hand, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever, then, he removes out of
the state that nature hath provided and left it in, he hath mixed his
labour with it, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby
makes it his property. ... For this 'labor' being the unquestionable
property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is
once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in
commmon for others. ...
"It will, perhaps, be objected to this, that if gathering the acorns or
other fruits of the earth, etc. makes a right to them, then one may
engross as much as he will. To which I answer, Not so. The same law of
Nature that does by this means give us property, does also bound that
property too. ...
"He that had as good left for his improvement as was already taken
up needed not complain, ought not to meddle in what was already
improved by another's labour....
"[I]t was impossible for any man, this way, to entrench upon the right
of another or to acquire to himself a property to the prejudice of his
neighbor, who would still have room for as good and as large a
possession...." (*Second Treatise of Government*, ch.5, sec.26-35)
|